Tuesday, February 23, 2010

Things I've learned

  1. It is absolutely critical to be able to separate Socratic questioning from "I think you're an idiot for not having arrived at this on your own".
  2. It is absolutely critical to be able to separate critique of your data from critique of your person.
  3. It is really hard to do this in the early years of grad school when every time you turn around you are being examined or tested or asked to validate your existence.
  4. It gets a lot easier to do this once you make the transition from grad school to somewhere that appreciates your skill and expertise.
Being able to do this is a learned behavior. Just like no one is born knowing how to do a flawless patch-clamp assay, it's a bit much to expect people to instantly recognize the difference between benevolent critique to improve the science v. gotcha questioning to make them sweat. It's kinder to point this out a time or two and then let them practice letting it roll off their egos on their own.

4 comments:

quietandsmalladventures said...

you have no idea how timely this is. i have comps tomorrow. i'm scared. it's all part of the process.

Ambivalent Academic said...

Hang in there. You will do a great job. Remember that leading questions are good, and so are tough questions. You'll get through it.

tideliar said...

Daaaaaaaaaaaamn straight. I hated learning this lesson, partly because I am arrogant prick. I'm trying to help my (ex-) grad student with her master's thesis now, and after a few months it's getting easier. The first couple of drafts was like walking on eggshells!

Me: "You don't explain the structure of NR2A well in the first paragraph."

Her: "Oh, so I'm an idiot! Thanks very much. Don't bother reading anymore then!"

Me: "?*!?"

Prakash Manandhar said...

Does this mean that I am safe to assume the majority of the questions are of the Socratic type?